Preview Mode Links will not work in preview mode

The Option Block


The Option Block All-Star Panel breaks down the latest developments in the options market, analyzes unusual options activity, explains cutting-edge options strategies, answers listener questions and much more. Whether you're an active options trader or just getting started in the options market, The Option Block will keep you informed and entertained.

Feb 13, 2015

Option Block 408: Juicy Apple Puts

Trading Block: Earnings today after the bell:  AIG, Groupon, King Digital Media (Candy Crush). Earnings before the bell today: Avon, McGraw Hill, Kellogg Co. Insuring against Apple blow-up just got a lot more expensive. Tesla shares fall after earnings, despite musk apple comparison. Oil prices rally from sharp losses.

 

 

Odd Block: Call buyers in Domtar Corp (UFS), call buyers on fire in FireEye Inc (FEYE), and put spreads trade in Morgan Stanley (MS)

 

Xpress Block: Alex discusses the OX Help Desk.

 

Mail Block: Listener questions and comments

  • Question from Nick Snow - Hello Mark and other guests. I was wondering if you have ever put together a quick review of other people or newsletters in the industry. For years I have come to options insider because it doesn't spam me, it does not ask for my credit card, and above all I find the information on all shows greatly beneficial. There seem to be so many hacks out there ready to take others money, I think it is time you rate a bunch of other professionals with a simple "Put or Call" rating meaning that company or person is worthless to listen to or actually useful. So of course the options insider would get a call rating from me since it is about the only premium I would be willing to purchase. Thanks again look forward to listening into the future.
  • Question from Tom A Bomb - Distinguished Gentlemen, This is a follow-on to a question I posted a few weeks ago regarding a back-of-the-envelope method to price vertical spreads. Last time, I got a vote of at least 50% crap, and I am really shooting to get the crap content down to around 25%. The panel identified that skew and vol estimates were the weak spots in my method. I am somewhat disappointed on the skew aspect. I do not think there is any quick way to incorporate skew into a calculation on a napkin. So, bummer there… But on to my real question: Some of the panel members speculated I might be getting my vol estimates from delta. Not true. I am not using implied either. In large part, the point of my method is to remove any short-term noise to arrive at a “stable” or “normal” estimate. To that end, I will usually match my input vol figure to realized vol of over a comparable period. For example: I want to buy a XYZ 95-100 vert call spread that is 100 days from expiration. 100-day realized vol is currently around 15%. I use that 15% vol input and calculate there is a 30% chance that XYZ will finish above $100 at expiration. Therefore, $5 (width between strikes) x 30% would put the mid-price of the spread around $1.50… Now, I totally understand that historical performance is not an indicator of future yada-yada-yada. The main goal here is to avoid buying when, historically speaking, prices are pumped; or selling when prices are depressed. So, there is my volatility angle. Admittedly, I’m still beat on the skew angle. I will get back to you on that I suppose. Gentlemen, estimates on the crap content...? (Sorry Longo I know this is a long question – tried 3 times to make is shorter! Please cover this on the Option Block again, if you can! Thanks!)

 

Around the Block: Earnings before the bell today: Avon, McGraw Hill, Kellogg Co.Earnings tomorrow: Time Inc.